4/10/2023 0 Comments Healing halo reddit![]() The idea itself could have worked had it been carefully orchestrated at a party convention, he argues in the Star. Mind you, not only is Trudeau directly accountable to his party and the voters for his decision - the senators themselves say they won’t pay it any mind. (The Globe describes the unilateral decision as “Harper squared.”) Very fair point. “Reforming Parliament by fiat seems an odd choice for a leader who’s tried to brand himself as a democrat and a listener,” the Ottawa Citizen‘s editorialists argue, and it’s a very good point. The Globe and Mail‘s editorialists have similar concerns: “a new Senate appointment process … could have the unintended consequence of empowering an upper house that is still unelected, and still unrepresentative. n any event it’s no argument against some new consultative body that would nominate or vet appointments, whether they’re partisan or not. ![]() Mind you, couldn’t we hold the Senate itself accountable for its members’ behaviour? Didn’t we ultimately do that in the Clusterduff? It wasn’t Stephen Harper who suspended him. It’s a fair argument against ending partisanship altogether, which we think is overkill (and a bit weird). In short, she thinks “installing an unaccountable meritocracy in the Senate - even as it stands to enhance the credibility of a discredited institution - sounds more like a prescription to circumvent Canada’s ailing parliamentary democracy than to mend it.” The Star‘s Chantal Hébert isn’t sure how a Senate as envisioned by Trudeau would operate: It “might just roll over and let the elected house have its way with most legislation,” or it might embrace its independence and get bold - in which case, as she says, there’s suddenly nobody to complain to but the Senators themselves. But as Ivison says, that’s Trudeau’s “problem, not ours.” We get to pull up a lawn chair, crack open a frosty one and watch! There’s all kinds of risk involved, of course. “Setting up an appointments commission to recommend qualified people to the Senate should not be beyond the bounds of man,” as he says: The UK does it for the House of Lords, and we do it for vice-regal appointments. ![]() The Post‘s John Ivison seems to think so. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |